United We Stand, Divided We Falk

21 Feb
United We Stand, Divided We Falk

In a moment of post-ironic solidarity conservatives across Wisconsin came together in mass thanks of the gift they received yesterday over the state’s largest public sector union endorsing the most union-sympathetic candidate running against Governor Scott Walker in a recall election.  Following the endorsement of WEAC — Wisconsin Education Association Council — the state’s largest teachers union only twelve days before, the state division of AFSCME, representing some 60,000 public workers, giddily rallied behind candidate Kathleen Falk, former Dane County Executive and two-time loser for statewide office.  Conservatives did not respond to our requests for an interview, but in an email a spokesperson summed it up in bold italics: “Told You So!”

Hovering somewhere between the epitome and the totem pole of all things conservatives lambast — a Madison liberal clearly in cahoots with the unions — the GOP could not be more smugly indulged about this lagniappe falling upon their lap.  Such endorsements do nothing to distance the dismissive association between union “big bosses” and their Democratic bedfellows.  All along, Walker and his ilk have effectively framed the uprising, protests, and recall efforts as driven by union self-interests and Democratic sore losers.  Indeed, said Walker’s campaign, “After pledging to return Wisconsin to the failed policies of the past, it comes as no surprise that Kathy Falk is emerging as the handpicked choice of the big government union bosses who will fund her campaign. We are confident that statewide voters will reject Falk’s Madison liberal agenda of raising taxes on hardworking Wisconsinites for a third time should she become the Democrat nominee.”

And in a mostly amusing on-the-fritz hissy fit, Majority Leader Scott Fitzgerald said on the Senate floor last week in response to a bill (SB 233) that proposed to restore the collective bargaining rights to public employees rescinded by Act X of last year, “Are we talking about Kathleen Falk and the quid pro quo with WEAC, the teachers union?  …  Kathleen Falk, who cut some deal, a gubernatorial candidate with $24,000 in her account and yet is standing at the podium embracing Mary Bellhugging! literally standing arm in arm!?  Is that what you’re talking about?  Is that what this discussion is about today in the Senate, about Kathleen Falk and the corruption that now exists between the unions and your gubernatorial candidate?  ‘Cause if it is, I’d love to talk about that!  We’ll talk about it all day, if you want.  Please.  You gotta be kidding me!”

Both panjandrums of FitzWalkerstan are right: Falk’s endorsements smack of what conservatives love to hate about liberals — the same way the latter rails against the former’s nabobs hobnobbing with corporate “fat cats.”  But what does this mean?  That the unions, who represent working people, are backing a candidate with a stellar background in supporting workers’ rights?  Quel scandal!  Would this be any different than the Sierra Club  throwing their support behind a pro-environmental candidate?  Or a CEO favoring a no corporate tax campaign promise by a Republican?  That the state’s largest two unions have so quickly endorsed Falk is hardly surprising, though what it means for the rest of the recall movement is less lucid.

To be sure, whoever runs against Walker will be tar-feather framed in one slanderous manner or another, so perhaps it’s good to get out the “Madison liberal” libel early and be done with it.  (If the candidate against Walker be one of the state senators who fled Wisconsin last year to delay ACT X, s/he will be accused of not doing their job, running away, dereliction of duty, etc.  Or if Tom Barrett wins the Democratic primary and runs against Walker in the general election, it will be perceived as a personal vendetta after losing against Walker in the November 2010 election.  (It’s worth noting, too, that both Falk and Barrett ran for governor but lost in the primary to Jim Doyle in 2002.) But while personal attacks and misinformation are foregone conclusions of electioneering, what service are we doing by making it so easy for the GOP?

Why we can flip two Senate seats to Democrat and collect almost two million signatures in 60 days to force recalls against six additional Republicans, but fumble all-thumbs when it comes to advancing an exciting, rally-around candidate for this historic recall is a hell of a mystery to me.  Personally, I think Falk would make an awful choice all but precluding the least chance we have of ousting Walker from office, which is plenty enough a David-and-Goliath task in and of itself.  And I’m hardly alone in folks already from Dane County who do not want her to win the primary.  Barrett, too, would be a terrible flop.  (He would do well to heed that other Scott Fitzgerald — the author of The Great Gatsby — and his bitter obiter dictum, “There are no second acts in American lives.”)  And as for state Senator Kathleen Vinehout, the only other officially declared candidate thus far, I’d say she has as much luck winning a contentious statewide election as a geek IT guy getting a drink in a lesbian biker bar.

What I do find disappointing in Falk is her pledge, if elected governor, to veto any state budget that would not restore collective bargaining.  Remember when we criticized Republicans for including collective bargaining, which neither costs nor saves the state a penny, in the budget in the first place?  And remember how we had to maintain over and over that this whole entire fight against Walker wasn’t just about the unions or collective bargaining?  And remember, too, when we were all up in arms about Republicans signing pledges not to raise taxes?  So how is Falk’s predisposition any less shortsighted or doctrinal?  I suppose it’s welcome to know how she stands about this issue as she is running for office, unlike Walker who never mentioned boo about this back in 2010, but I am far more concerned about the state as a whole than the public employees sectors specifically.  And while I would hope that Falk expands her campaign’s message not only to redress the policies of Walker and the Republican majorities, but to set the state on a post-partisan course, one that is progressive and not defensive, moving us forward and not just playing catch-up — which I will extend to whoever wins the primary and runs against Walker — I find it concerning, not least from a tactical perspective, that her candidacy has been so, well, stereotypical.

I for one did not knock on a couple hundred doors in the dark or stand on corners in the cold collecting signatures to recall Walker only for all of every volunteer’s efforts to be potentially sabotaged by a poor candidate whose self-importance and opportunism may very well trump the collective goal.  I know a lot of people who feel this way.  What is at stake is way too important to be blown by this.  But this is why we need to have a primary, to determine the absolute best-case scenario to beat Walker.  And should that be Kathleen Falk, then her run itself will be too important to let personal quibbles get in the way, even or especially if her candidacy would be the darling poster child for conservative heckling and invective.  Certainly.  But we did not invest so much, from occupying the Capitol to collecting signatures in one long wonderful year, to come up so short with a lackluster candidate as established as Kathleen Falk.


Tags: , , , , , , ,

3 responses to “United We Stand, Divided We Falk

  1. Maury

    February 22, 2012 at 5:23 pm

    As usual, a brilliant (and brilliantly-worded) assessment. I, too, am very disappointed (and not a bit surprised) about the endorsement. Let’s hope some obviously far-better candidate rises to the occasion and wins the nomination. I don’t think the endorsement is going to get Falk many votes, however. I imagine a lot of teachers are examining their relationship with WEAC and they can’t help but notice how ineffective the union has been for the past two decades. Tommy Thompson exposed WEAC’s paper tiger status 19 years ago when the QEO law was passed without organized resistance. Had every teacher in the state taken a day off the next day, the QEO law would never have passed and teachers would not have seen their pay fall 47% below the cost of living over the next 15 years while other comparable professions saw theirs rise by 150%. I’ll never know why we didn’t all walk out. Seems to me the moment we needed leadership, the leaders placed fear of prosecution above all else.

    IN exactly the same way, if every teacher in the state had stayed home on Monday, Feb. 14, 2011, we would still have our collective bargaining rights and the shock troops in the capitol would have had to back down on a number of issues. But again, the WEAC leadership backed off playing the trump card. If anyone counter-argues that we wouldn’t have been able to get many people out on the streets on such short notice, then I say teachers didn’t deserve to win the fight in the first round anyway. The public workers (hence, the public) will win in the end…I’m sure of that. But it could have been quicker (hence, less painful) if we’d acted sooner, and the teachers in France must have been scratching their well-coiffed and richly perfumed heads wondering what on earth any American teacher was doing at work that week unless it was to feed the hamster.

    And most important, if, back in 1980, we had all paid very close attention to what people like Timothy Bauer were telling us, (though less articulately), we would not be where we are today. We should never have let the plutocrats divide us from one another, acquire healthy companies just to raid their pension funds, Enron us and Lehman us and taxes-are-bad us into the poverty-ridden third-rate democracy we’ve become. I mean, European nations sending observers to our elections in the fall as if we were (fill in the blank with the name of any failed state, of which there are now twice as many as a decade ago) for pete’s sake?

    The gap between the rich and poor hit a minimum around 1973 and has been climbing ever since. The richest long ago bought every physical thing there was to buy and all that’s left to spend on is political influence. It’s never been so clear, and let’s hope the kids these days are paying attention to the amazing shit going on. (I bring good news from the trenches–I think they are. Paying attention. A few of them. Occasionally. Smell’s like teen hope.)

    You keep up the excellent work and I’ll keep hoping more and more people read your posts…

    • t corcoran bauer

      February 29, 2012 at 10:16 pm


      Thank you for the thoughtful and thought-inspiring response. Yours is a passionately articulated voice uniquely hovering between “solidarity forever” and “unions suck!” To have an inside perspective of a public school teacher who can still have a lover’s quarrel with the union is invaluable, and I encourage you to keep up the dialogue; indeed, I would welcome a guest “scribble” by you anytime!

      Furthermore, we see oeuil to oeuil about the French. For all the flack and bad rep the French get from us, mon dieu! do those people know how to protest! Midwest “nice” is not without its own setbacks sometimes…

      Lastly, I thoroughly appreciate your thoughts about the last 30-40 years. Coincidentally, it is the same time period circumscribing my own life. Not coincidentally, this very subject — the reactionary renascence of (neo)conservatism — is one of my tireless obsessions and a series I hope to delve into in the next coming months. But not before all our hamsters are amply fed!



  2. Carla

    February 22, 2012 at 5:32 pm

    Well said tim..couldn’t agree more. a little disappointed in our union


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: